A prospective short-term study to evaluate methodologies for the assessment of disease extent, impact, and wound evolution in patients with dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.

BACKGROUND: Standardized assessments for dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB) are needed. This prospective, multicenter, 4-week, observational study was designed to evaluate DEB assessments for suitability as clinical trial endpoints. METHODS: Patients with confirmed DEB diagnosis and ≥ 5 measurable wounds were included. The primary outcome was change from baseline in wound surface area (WSA) of 5 selected wounds by 3-dimensional imaging. Secondary endpoints were change from baseline in clinician global assessment (CGA) of WSA, wound characteristics, disease-related questionnaires and instruments (disease severity, quality of life [QoL], pain and disability, and itch), and tolerability of procedures. RESULTS: Of 30 enrolled patients, 29 completed the study (of whom, 28 had recessive DEB). Median age was 17.8 years (range, 3.8-58.7). All patients developed new or recurrent wounds during the 4-week study. Of the wounds selected at baseline, 45/150 (30.0%) healed by week 2; an additional 38 healed by week 4, while 8 of those healed at week 2 had recurred by week 4 for a total of 75/150 (50.0%) healed wounds at week 4. Mean values for WSA, CGA, and disease-related questionnaire and instrument scores remained steady during this 4-week observational study. Of the 10 disease-related questionnaires and instruments assessed, the scores for the Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI) and the Instrument for Scoring Clinical Outcomes for Research of Epidermolysis Bullosa (iscorEB) did not substantially overlap between moderate and severe disease. Between mild and moderate disease, only the EBDASI scores did not substantially overlap. CONCLUSIONS: These results stress the dynamic nature of wounds, even during a 4-week period of observation, and suggest that a combination of clinician-assessed outcomes and patient-/caregiver-reported outcomes is needed to provide a comprehensive assessment of DEB severity and impact. In addition, these results support the use of EBDASI and iscorEB to monitor disease severity as both produced scores that did not substantially overlap between disease severity strata. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02178969 . Registered 4 June 2014, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02178969 .

A systematic literature review of the disease burden in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is a genetic collagen disorder characterized by skin fragility leading to blistering, wounds, and scarring. There are currently no approved curative therapies. The objective of this manuscript is to provide a comprehensive literature review of the disease burden caused by RDEB. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted in MEDLINE and Embase in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Observational and interventional studies on the economic, clinical, or humanistic burden of RDEB were included. RESULTS: Sixty-five studies were included in the review. Patients had considerable wound burden, with 60% reporting wounds covering more than 30% of their body. Increases in pain and itch were seen with larger wound size. Chronic wounds were larger and more painful than recurrent wounds. Commonly reported symptoms and complications included lesions and blistering, anemia, nail dystrophy and loss, milia, infections, musculoskeletal contractures, strictures or stenoses, constipation, malnutrition/nutritional problems, pseudosyndactyly, ocular manifestations, and dental caries. Many patients underwent esophageal dilation (29-74%; median dilations, 2-6) and gastrostomy tube placement (8-58%). In the severely affected population, risk of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was 76% and mortality from SCC reached 84% by age 40. Patients with RDEB experienced worsened quality of life (QOL), decreased functioning and social activities, and increased pain and itch when compared to other EB subtypes, other skin diseases, and the general population. Families of patients reported experiencing high rates of burden including financial burden (50-54%) and negative impact on private life (79%). Direct medical costs were high, though reported in few studies; annual payer-borne total medical costs in Ireland were $84,534 and annual patient-borne medical costs in Korea were $7392. Estimated annual US costs for wound dressings ranged from $4000 to $245,000. Patients spent considerable time changing dressings: often daily (13-54% of patients) with up to three hours per change (15-40%). CONCLUSION: Patients with RDEB and their families/caregivers experience significant economic, humanistic, and clinical burden. Further research is needed to better understand the costs of disease, how the burden of disease changes over the patient lifetime and to better characterize QOL impact, and how RDEB compares with other chronic, debilitating disorders.

Long-term safety and sustained efficacy for up to 5 years of treatment with recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein in subjects with haemophilia B: Results from the B-YOND extension study.

INTRODUCTION: Recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) has demonstrated efficacy for treatment of haemophilia B in the Phase 3 B-LONG and Kids B-LONG studies. However, long-term rFIXFc safety and efficacy data have not yet been reported. AIM: To report long-term rFIXFc safety and efficacy in subjects with haemophilia B. METHODS: B-YOND (NCT01425723) was an open-label extension for eligibl previously treated subjects who completed B-LONG or Kids B-LONG. Subjects received ≥1 treatment regimen: weekly prophylaxis (WP), individualized interval prophylaxis (IP), modified prophylaxis or episodic treatment. Subjects could switch regimens at any time. The primary endpoint was inhibitor development. RESULTS: Ninety-three subjects from B-LONG and 27 from Kids B-LONG (aged 3-63 years) were enrolled. Most subjects received WP (B-LONG: n = 51; Kids B-LONG: n = 23). For subjects from B-LONG, median (range) treatment duration was 4.0 (0.3-5.4) years and median (range) number of exposure days (EDs) was 146 (8-462) EDs. Corresponding values for paediatric subjects were 2.6 (0.2-3.9) years and 132 (50-256) EDs. No inhibitors were observed (0 per 1000 subject-years; 95% confidence interval, 0-8.9) and the overall rFIXFc safety profile was consistent with prior studies. Annualized bleed rates remained low and extended-dosing intervals were maintained for most subjects. Median dosing interval for the IP group was approximately 14 days for adults and adolescents (n = 31) and 10 days for paediatric subjects (n = 5). CONCLUSIONS: B-YOND results confirm the long-term (up to 5 years, with cumulative duration up to 6.5 years) well-characterized safety and efficacy of rFIXFc treatment for haemophilia B.

Recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein for the treatment of severe haemophilia A: Final results from the ASPIRE extension study.

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy and safety of recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) as an extended half-life treatment for severe haemophilia A were demonstrated in the Phase 3 A-LONG and Kids A-LONG studies. Eligible subjects who completed A-LONG and Kids A-LONG could enrol in ASPIRE (NCT01454739), an open-label extension study. AIM: To report the long-term safety and efficacy of rFVIIIFc in subjects with severe haemophilia A who enrolled in ASPIRE. METHODS: Previously treated subjects received one or more of the following regimens: individualized prophylaxis (IP), weekly prophylaxis, modified prophylaxis or episodic treatment. Subjects could switch treatment regimen at any time. The primary endpoint was inhibitor development. RESULTS: A total of 150 subjects from A-LONG and 61 subjects from Kids A-LONG enrolled in ASPIRE. Most subjects received the IP regimen (A-LONG: n = 110; Kids A-LONG: n = 59). Median (range) treatment duration in ASPIRE for subjects from A-LONG and Kids A-LONG was 3.9 (0.1-5.3) years and 3.2 (0.3-3.9) years, respectively. No inhibitors were observed (0 per 1000 subject-years; 95% confidence interval, 0-5.2) and the overall rFVIIIFc safety profile was consistent with prior studies. For subjects on the IP regimen, annualized bleed rates (ABR) remained low (median overall ABR for adults and adolescents was <1.0) and extended-dosing intervals were maintained (median of 3.5 days) for the majority of subjects in ASPIRE. CONCLUSION: ASPIRE results, which include up to 5 years of follow-up data, confirm earlier reports on the consistent and well-characterized safety and efficacy of rFVIIIFc treatment for severe haemophilia A.

Impact of hepatic and renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of eliglustat therapy for Gaucher disease type 1.

Eliglustat is a first-line oral therapy for adults with Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1) who have extensive (EM), intermediate (IM), or poor (PM) CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotypes. It was initially not recommended in GD1 patients with hepatic or renal impairment due to insufficient data. Two Phase 1 studies (NCT02536937/NCT02536911) evaluated the effects of hepatic and renal impairment on pharmacokinetics and tolerability following a single 84-mg dose of eliglustat. Compared to matched healthy EM subjects (n = 7 for both studies), geometric means for eliglustat maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC) were not substantially different in EMs with mild hepatic impairment (n = 6), higher in EMs with moderate hepatic impairment (n = 7), and similar in EMs with severe renal impairment (n = 7). Higher exposures of eliglustat at steady-state were predicted using a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model in EMs with mild or moderate hepatic impairment compared with normal hepatic function after repeated 84-mg eliglustat doses. Higher exposures of eliglustat were also predicted in EMs with mild hepatic impairment after coadministration with a CYP2D6 or CYP3A inhibitor with repeated doses. Based on these results, the eliglustat drug label was revised for patients with hepatic or renal impairment.

First-in-human, randomized dose-escalation study of the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and immunogenicity of PF-06480605 in healthy subjects.

AIMS: Human genetic, tissue expression, proteomics, transcriptomics and nonclinical studies implicate tumour necrosis factor α-like ligand 1A (TL1A) as a novel target in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). PF-06480605, a fully human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody, targets TL1A. This first-in-human, Phase 1, dose-escalation study assessed safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and immunogenicity of intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) PF-06480605 in healthy subjects (NCT01989143). METHODS: Ninety-two subjects were randomized to single ascending doses (SAD), PF-06480605 1 mg, 3 mg, 10 mg, 30 mg, 100 mg, 300 mg, 600 mg or 800 mg IV, or multiple ascending doses (MAD), PF-06480605 3 × 500 mg IV, or 3 × 30 mg, 3 × 100 mg, or 3 × 300 mg SC every 2 weeks for three doses, or placebo. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity profiles and total TL1A, anti-drug antibody (ADA) and neutralizing antibody (NAb) levels were assessed at pre-determined times. RESULTS: PF-06480605 SAD up to 800 mg IV and MAD up to 300 mg ×3 SC and 500 mg ×3 IV were well tolerated. Overall, there were 45 and 44 treatment-emergent adverse events in SAD and MAD cohorts, respectively, and no deaths or serious adverse events. PF-06480605 exposure generally increased dose-dependently. ADA and NAb levels did not impact safety, pharmacokinetics, or pharmacodynamics at higher doses. Target engagement was demonstrated through dose-dependent differences in serum total soluble TL1A concentrations for PF-06480605 vs placebo cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: PF-06480605 was generally well tolerated, and binding of soluble TL1A was maintained throughout the dose interval, supporting further study of PF-06480605 in patients with IBD and other inflammatory conditions.

Inadequacy of current pediatric epinephrine autoinjector needle length for use in infants and toddlers.

BACKGROUND: Epinephrine injection represents the standard of care for anaphylaxis treatment. It is most effective if delivered intramuscularly, whereas inadvertent intraosseous injection may be harmful. The needle length in current pediatric epinephrine autoinjectors (EAIs) is 12.7 mm; however, the ideal needle length for infants and toddlers weighing less than 15 kg is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the skin-to-bone distance (STBD) and skin-to-muscle distance (STMD) at baseline and after simulated EAI application in infants and toddlers (weighing 7.5-15 kg). METHODS: Study participants recruited from 2 North American allergy clinics underwent baseline and compression (10-lb pressure) ultrasonography of the anterolateral thigh with a modified ultrasound transducer mimicking the footprint and maximum pressure application of an EAI device. Ultrasound images, with clinical data masked, were analyzed offline for STBD and STMD in short-axis approach. RESULTS: Of 53 infants (mean age, 18.9 months; 54.7% male; 81.1% white; mean weight, 11.0 kg), 51 had adequate images for short-axis STBD measurements. In these infants, the mean (SD) baseline STBD was 22.4 (3.8 mm), and the mean (SD) STMD was 7.9 (1.7) mm. With 10-lb compression, the mean (SD) STBD was 13.3 (2.1) mm, and the mean (SD) STMD was 6.3 (1.2) mm. An EAI with a needle length of 12.7 mm applying 10-lb pressure could strike the bone in 43.1% of infants and toddlers in this cohort. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the optimal EAI needle length for infants and toddlers weighing 7.5 to 15 kg should be shorter than the needle length in currently available pediatric EAIs to avoid accidental intraosseous injections.

A randomized phase 1 pharmacokinetic trial comparing the potential biosimilar PF-05280014 with trastuzumab in healthy volunteers (REFLECTIONS B327-01).

AIMS: The pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity between PF-05280014, a proposed trastuzumab biosimilar, trastuzumab sourced from European Union (trastuzumab-EU) or from United States (trastuzumab-US) was evaluated. Safety and immunogenicity were also assessed. METHODS: In this phase 1, double-blind trial (NCT01603264), 105 healthy male volunteers were randomized 1:1:1 to receive a single 6 mg kg(-1) intravenous dose of PF-05280014, trastuzumab-EU, or trastuzumab-US, and evaluated for 70 days. Drug concentration-time data were analyzed by non-compartmental methods. PK similarity for the comparisons of PF-05280014 to each of trastuzumab-EU and trastuzumab-US, and trastuzumab-EU to trastuzumab-US were determined using the standard 80.00% to 125.00% bioequivalence criteria. RESULTS: Baseline demographics for the 101 subjects evaluable for PK were similar across all arms. The three products exhibited similar PK profiles with target-mediated disposition. The 90% CIs for the ratios of Cmax , AUC (0 , t last) and AUC(0,∞) were within 80.00% to 125.00% for all three pairwise comparisons. Adverse events (AEs) were similar across all arms with treatment-related AEs reported by 71.4%, 68.6% and 65.7% subjects in the PF-05280014, trastuzumab-EU, and trastuzumab-US arms, respectively. The most common AEs were infusion-related reactions, headache, chills, pyrexia and nausea. The AE term 'pyrexia' was numerically greater in the PF-05280014 arm. All post-dose samples, except 1, tested negative for anti-drug antibodies (ADA). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates PK similarity among PF-05280014, trastuzumab-EU and trastuzumab-US. The safety and immunogenicity profiles observed for the three products in this study are consistent with previous reports for trastuzumab.

Evaluation of the effect of food and ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of the smoothened inhibitor PF-04449913 in healthy volunteers.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of a potent cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitor, ketoconazole, and separately the effect of food on PF-04449913 pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers. METHODS: This was an open-label, two-sequence, three-period, three-treatment, single-dose, crossover study. Subjects were randomized to receive single doses of 200 mg PF-04449913 after an overnight fast or after consuming a high-fat meal during Period 1 or 2, with a washout period of at least 8 days. In Period 3, all subjects received ketoconazole (400 mg/day) (days 1-7) and a co-administered single 200-mg PF-04449913 dose (day 4). RESULTS: Geometric mean ratio of PF-04449913 in the presence of ketoconazole versus PF-04449913 alone was 2.40 [90% confidence interval (CI) 2.15, 2.68] for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(0-inf)) and 1.40 (90% CI 1.24, 1.58) for peak plasma concentration (C max). The geometric mean ratio for fed state compared with fasted state for AUC(0-inf) was 0.87 (90% CI 0.78, 0.97) and for C max was 0.66 (90% CI 0.56, 0.78). PF-04449913 was well tolerated, and all adverse events were mild to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: PF-04449913 plasma exposures and peak concentrations were increased following concurrent administration of ketoconazole in healthy volunteers. These findings provide the upper limit for expected PF-04449913 exposures after co-administration of a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor in patients with cancer who routinely receive antifungal azoles. While a high-fat meal decreased PF-04449913 exposure, the differences in plasma exposure under the two conditions were not considered clinically meaningful.

Gemcitabine Cytotoxicity: Interaction of Efflux and Deamination.

Gemcitabine is a cytidine analogue used in the treatment of various solid tumors. Little is known about how gemcitabine and its metabolites are transported out of cells. We set out to study the efflux of gemcitabine and the possible consequences of that process in cancer cells. We observed the efflux of gemcitabine and its deaminated metabolite, 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU) using high performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) after gemcitabine treatment. Non-selective ABCC-transport inhibition with probenecid significantly increased intracellular dFdU concentrations, with a similar trend observed with verapamil, a non-selective ABCB1 and ABCG2 transport inhibitor. Neither probenecid nor verapamil altered intracellular gemcitabine levels after the inhibition of deamination with tetrahydrourudine, suggesting that efflux of dFdU, but not gemcitabine, was mediated by ABC transporters. MTS assays showed that probenecid increased sensitivity to gemcitabine. While dFdU displayed little cytotoxicity, intracellular dFdU accumulation inhibited cytidine deaminase, resulting in increased gemcitabine levels and enhanced cytotoxicity. Knockdown of ABCC3, ABCC5 or ABCC10 individually did not significantly increase gemcitabine sensitivity, suggesting the involvement of multiple transporters. In summary, ABCC-mediated efflux may contribute to gemcitabine resistance through increased dFdU efflux that allows for the continuation of gemcitabine deamination. Reversing efflux-mediated gemcitabine resistance may require broad-based efflux inhibition.

Interferon and lamivudine vs. interferon for hepatitis B e antigen-positive hepatitis B treatment: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

AIMS: To compare interferon monotherapy with its combination with lamivudine for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive hepatitis B treatment. METHODS: Two independent researchers identified pertinent randomized controlled trials. The trials were evaluated for methodological quality and heterogeneity. Rates of sustained virological and biochemical responses, and HBeAg clearance and seroconversion were used as primary efficacy measures. Quantitative meta-analyses were conducted to assess differences between groups for conventional and pegylated interferon, and overall. RESULTS: Greater sustained virological, biochemical and seroconversion rates were observed with addition of lamivudine to conventional [odds ratio (OR)=3.1, 95% confidence intervals (CI) (1.7-5.5), P<0.0001, OR=1.8, 95% CI (1.2-2.7), P=0.007 and OR=1.8, 95% CI (1.1-2.8), P=0.01 respectively], although not pegylated [OR=1.1, 95% CI (0.5-2.3), P=0.8, OR=1.0, 95% CI (0.7-1.3), P=0.94, and OR=0.9, 95% CI (0.6-1.2), P=0.34 respectively] interferon-alpha, with no significant affect on HBeAg clearance rates [OR=1.6, 95% CI (0.9-2.7), P=0.09, and OR=0.8, 95% CI (0.6-1.1), P=0.26 respectively]. Excluding virological response (P<0.001), pegylated interferon monotherapy and conventional interferon and lamivudine combination therapy were similarly efficacious (P>0.05), with the former studied in harder to treat patients, as evidenced by the superior virological response observed with conventional as compared with pegylated interferon monotherapy (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: In comparable populations, pegylated interferon monotherapy is likely to be equally or more efficacious than conventional interferon and lamivudine combination therapy, thus constituting the treatment of choice, with no added benefit with lamivudine addition. However, when conventional interferon is used, its combination with lamivudine should be considered.

Lamivudine and interferon versus lamivudine monotherapy for HBeAg-positive hepatitis B treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.

The suboptimal outcomes of current chronic hepatitis B treatments have prompted the notion of combination therapy as a means of augmenting the therapeutic response. In this study, investigators compared lamivudine monotherapy versus its combination with conventional or pegylated interferon-alpha, pooling data from all pertinent randomized controlled studies into the meta-analysis. The studies were evaluated for methodologic quality and heterogeneity. Rates of sustained virologic and biochemical responses and of hepatitis B e antigen clearance and seroconversion were used as primary efficacy measures. Quantitative metaanalyses were conducted to assess differences between groups for conventional and pegylated interferon, and overall. Analysis yielded greater sustained virologic, biochemical, and seroconversion rates with the addition of conventional (odds ratio [OR]=4.5, 95% confidence interval [CI]=2.2-9.4, P<.001; OR=2.1, 95% CI=1.3-3.2, P=.002; and OR=2.6, 95% CI=1.4-4.8, P=.001, respectively) and pegylated (OR=2.0, 95% CI=1.1-3.6, P=.02; OR=1.8, 95% CI=1.3-2.6, P<.001; and OR=1.6, 95% CI=1.1-2.3, P=.03, respectively) interferon-alpha to lamivudine, with the former also yielding greater hepatitis B e antigen clearance rates (OR=2.6, 95% CI=1.3-5.2, P=.008). As previous studies suggested that pegylated interferon monotherapy and its combination with lamivudine were comparable, the use of this combination is not justified. In contrast, when conventional interferon-a is used, its combination with lamivudine should be considered.

Frequently overlooked and rarely listened to: music therapy in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures.

To elucidate the role of music therapy in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures following the conflicting outcomes reported in two recent studies. The findings of our recent meta-analysis that examined this matter were discussed in the context of later studies. Our meta-analysis illustrated the beneficial effects of music therapy on patient anxiety levels when used as a single measure of relaxation and analgesia. Beneficial effects were also shown on analgesia and sedation requirements and procedure duration times when used as an adjunct to pharmacotherapy. These findings are in agreement with those of both studies excluded from analysis and those that followed it. Music therapy is an effective tool for stress relief and analgesia in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures.

Somatostatin and gabexate for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis prevention: meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Prior studies have suggested the efficacy of somatostatin and gabexate in post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis prevention. We examined this notion in our study. METHODS: An extensive literature search led to the inclusion of seven homogeneous high-quality studies (Jadad score >or=4), involving 3,130 patients. The studies were grouped according to the drug's length of administration: given as an infusion for 12 h (groups SOM1 and GAB1 for somatostatin and gabexate, respectively); given as an infusion for less then 12 h (groups SOM2 and GAB2 for somatostatin and gabexate, respectively); and given as a bolus (group SOM3 for somatostatin, none identified for gabexate). Separate meta-analyses investigating post-procedural pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia rates were conducted in a random effects model. RESULTS: Pancreatitis analyses yielded significant risk differences for the SOM1, SOM3 and GAB1 groups. The resulting values were 7.7% (95% confidence intervals [CI][3.4 to 12.0], P < 0.0001), 8.2% (95% CI [4.4 to 12.0], P < 0.0001) and 5.2% (95% CI [1.1 to 9.4], P = 0.01), respectively. No statistically significant risk differences were observed for the SOM2 and GAB2 groups: -2.3% (95% CI [-5.2 to 0.5], P = 0.11) and -1.1% (95% CI [-3.8 to 1.6], P = 0.41), respectively. Hyperamylasemia analyses yielded significant risk differences for the SOM1 and SOM3 groups (P = 0.017 and 0.001, respectively), although not for the SOM2, GAB1 and GAB2 groups (P = 0.44, 0.49 and 0.47, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Somatostatin administered as a bolus seems to be an efficacious measure of post-ERCP pancreatitis prevention, reducing pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia rates, and being applicable to clinical practice. Further study is required before its introduction into routine care.

Good physicians from the perspective of their patients.

BACKGROUND: It is not currently known what is the patient's viewpoint of a "good" physician. We set out to define patient's priorities regarding different physician's attributes in 3 domains important in medical care. METHODS: Patients hospitalized or attending clinics at a large teaching hospital selected the 4 attributes that they considered most important out of 21 listed arbitrarily in a questionnaire. The questionnaire included 7 items each in the domains of patient autonomy, professional expertise and humanism. RESULTS: Participating patients (n = 445, mean age 57.5 +/- 16 years) selected professional expertise (50%), physician's patience and attentiveness (38% and 30%, respectively), and informing the patient, representing the patient's interests, being truthful and respecting patient's preferences (25-36% each) as the most essential attributes. Patient's selections were not significantly influenced by different demographic or clinical background. Selections of attributes in the domain of patient's autonomy were significantly more frequent and this was the preferred domain for 31% and as important as another domain for 16%--significantly more than the domain of professional expertise (P = 0.008), and much more than the domain of humanism and support (P < 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: Patients studied want their physicians to be highly professional and expert clinicians and show humaneness and support, but their first priority is for the physician to respect their autonomy.